GOP Ego-nomics


A couple of months ago, a national controversy erupted when it was suggested by Democratic operative James Carville that the leader of the Republican party was Rush Limbaugh. The message was foolishly countered by RNC Chairman Michael Steele who dismissed Rush as "an entertainer". The debate continues within the party as to who the leader of the party is. The party is indeed out of sync with the trouncing it received in the last two elections. The hard core conservative crowd is at odds with the "bigger tent" wing who feel as though the party needs to be more "inclusive"-which to me means compromising. I have an idea on who the spokes person should be: Republicans. The party can and should come to a consensus and promote a unified message-when the party nominates its candidate for 2012, he or she will become the face of the party and sell that message to the American people. I would like to see "old School" conservatives like former speaker of the House Newt Gingrich play a major role in re-focusing the party. Younger conservatives need to be reminded of what can happen when the party actually sticks to it's conservative ideals.

The Gingrich Republicans-who ushered in the 'contract with America'-a document which promised smaller government through fiscal responsibility, lower taxes and welfare reform. The 104th congress- which balanced the budget and controlled congress for 12 years- was the last Republican congress that behaved fiscally responsible. The silly debates about Rush or Steele should be tossed to the side. It does nothing more than delight the Democrats and the mainstream media. Steele and Limbaugh should understand their roles, there is room for both in the conservative comeback. Love Rush or hate him, he's a true Reagan conservative. Thank god that someone still knows what that is.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Legend Of The Unarmed White Man (Revised)

BP Crisis Brings Out Radical Left

Uncovering A Gigantic Royal Scam