The CIA- Bin Ladin Myth

The recent cleansing of the earth of Osama Bin Ladin has re-ignited old discussions about Al Qaeda and its origins. Pundits have been fond of reciting the "fact" that Osama Bin Ladin was a creation of the CIA during its proxy war against the soviets in Afghanistan. The US was alleged to have "trained" and funded the so called Mujahadeen (Holy warriors) rebels led by Osama. It sounds quite intriguing-a quintessential Frankenstein story of the creation turning against its creator-if only it were true. It has been one of the most longstanding oft repeated myths regarding Bin Ladin. This urban tale is used by the left to illustrate faulty US foreign policy in supporting resistance forces in the middle east which in turn creates what is known as "blowback' when those same forces turn against us.

It is no revelation that the United States was an open supporter of the Afghan resistance with money and weapons. Osama Bin Ladin went to Afghanistan in the 1980's-family wealth in hand- to support the Afghan resistance. There were two fronts in the resistance, along with the afghan fighters, there was a Saudi Arabia sponsored rag tag group of fighters who filtered into the country to help drive out the Soviets. The "Arab volunteers" as they became known, were not well regarded by the Afghans or their CIA backers. They believed they were inferior fighters that did not take direction well. Many of them were hardly volunteers. Some were taken out of prisons in Egypt and Saudi Arabia and sent to fight. Osama was a financier and commander of this group and desired to create an all Arab resistance force. After the US began supplying the Afghan resistance with surface to air missiles the war turned in favor of the rebels. After the soviets were driven out and Osama's stature began to grow larger, he falsely became associated with the CIA sponsored Afghans- and so the myth was born. The CIA association was hotly disputed by Osama himself in an interview with Arab news outlet Al Jazeera:

"As for their claim that they supported the Jihad and the struggle against the soviets, well this support came from Arab countries, especially from the Gulf....The Americans are lying when they claim they helped us at any point, and we challenge them to present a single shred of evidence to prove it. In fact they were a burden to us...Unintended confluence of interest does not mean there is any kind of link or tacit agreement".

For the record, the agency has never claimed an asociation with Osama. Al Qaeda #2 Aymin Al Zawahiri in his autobiographical "Knights Under The Banner Of the Prophet", wrote: "The truth that everyone should learn is that the United States did not give one penny in aid to the [Arab] Mujaheddin". A Former Bin Ladin associate Abu Musab al-Suri i wrote in his Jihadist history manifesto "The Call to Global Islamic Resistance":"It is a lie that the Afghan Arabs were formed with the backing of the CIA". Journalist Peter Bergan who interviewed Bin Ladin in 1997 has also disputed this CIA-Bin Ladin alliance as did Michael Scheuer who headed the CIA's Bin Ladin desk. This assertion has been repeated dozens of times over the past week by mainstream media pundits with a goal to paint US foreign policy in the middle east as 'Chickens coming home to roost'. The problem is this chicken isn't ours-he belongs to the Saudis who have not surprisingly denied any close association with him. Although claims of a Bin Ladin-CIA history have been made for almost two decades, proof of such a relationship has yet surface.

The Americans had no dealings with the Arab Afghan's and almost none with the Afghan Mujahadeen. The US agent which ran the war was the Pakistani intelligence service ISI. Brigidier Mohammad Yousaf, who coordinated the war on the Pakistani side wrote in his 1992 book "The Bear Trap": "No Americans ever trained or had direct contact with the Mujaheddin. Good people on both sides can disagree US policy in Afghanistan or any other country in the world. However one should not let myths overshadow the truth. The late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan summed it up best: You're entitled to you're own opinion but not your own facts.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Legend Of The Unarmed White Man (Revised)

Image
The August 2014 shooting death of unarmed black teen Mike Brown in St. Louis by a white police officer and the subsequent decision by the grand jury not to indict has brought unrest to American Streets. The protestors feel that police are shooting and killing mostly unarmed black men at alarming rates. Many also believe that police interaction amongst white's is all together different due to the benefits of "white privilege". "If that had of been a white man..." is a common refrain from blacks when speaking of a negative experience with a white police officer. The media plays an integral role in these perceptions by continuously assaulting us with images of black victims and white perpetrators. In light of the Brown incident and other controversial shootings this year, the adjective attached to these perceived victims is "unarmed". The term is a staple in the lexicon of the American media which has painted a false sense of reality for millions of Ame
Read more

BP Crisis Brings Out Radical Left

Image
Once again the left, with the help of Jesse Jackson shows its ignorance of and hatred for capitalism. The BP crisis which began with the explosion of an offshore oil rig which resulted in a fire that killed 19 people. The pipe located one mile undersea began to spew oil into the gulf and has for over fifty days now. The Reverend has been for weeks calling for a boycott of BP. Now comes word that several BP stations have been vandalized. The fact that such vitriol and anger results from what was clearly a tragic accident is surely tragic in itself. Someone should explain to the reverend that oil companies exited the gas station business years ago. The stations are by and large owned by franchisees and independent operators who squeeze out razor thin margins on gasoline-hence the reason for the lottery tickets, potato chips and soft drinks that has become a staple of these often family owned businesses. To make matters worse, the Rev. Jackson stated that "the mom and pop stations a
Read more

Uncovering A Gigantic Royal Scam

Image
The old saying "Too many chiefs and not enough Indians" is by modern standards politically incorrect. However there is a new phenomena that is could take its place. There seems to be too many Kings and Queens and not enough subjects. Peruse Facebook and one will see untold references to "Black Kings" and "Black Queens" which is intended to foster self esteem in the black community. What is wrong with this one may ask? It is built on a ridiculous premise, historical ignorance and grotesque revisionism. For starters, every culture at one time or another has been ruled by monarchs. So by this logic every Anglo British citizen is a King or a Queen since they still have a symbolic monarchy today. Kings and Queens are mere titles-not character traits. Monarchs were selected by either bloodline or bloody conquest. Some of the most dastardly rulers in history were Kings. King John, Herod, Leopold, Caligula are just a few-African rulers were hardly an exception. I
Read more